RURAL ROADS TO SECURITY: The Curse of Factory Farming

Written on:December 22, 2014
 
Comments
Add One

RURAL ROADS TO SECURITY America’s Third Struggle for Freedom RT. REV. MSGR. LUIGI G. LIGUTTI, LL.D Copyright, 1940 The Bruce Publishing Company Printed in the U.S.A.

RURAL ROADS TO SECURITY
America’s Third Struggle for Freedom
RT. REV. MSGR.
LUIGI G. LIGUTTI, LL.D Copyright, 1940
The Bruce Publishing Company Printed in the U.S.A.

Tenancy and land speculation constitute a very serious economic menace and should be reduced to a minimum. But there is a more serious economic menace on the horizon which also involves the land, and follows when ownership and tenant systems break down; namely, corporation farming. Although this menace has not progressed very far, yet it is very serious because it is being promoted by the industrialized, urban-minded, mechanized, stock-gambling forces of this generation. The unsound, agricultural technique of corporation farming will ultimately bring this system to naught. But America, unless we do some thinking and take effective action, may try this unsound agriculture too, if for no other reason than that it makes so many promises under the aegis of our American economic idol, the corporation.

Corporation farming will in time destroy itself with its mechanical methods in a field essentially biological, but before this stupidity will reap its empty harvest, our American families will be finally and completely uprooted from the soil. All ownerships will pass to United Farms Incorporated. All rural skills, cultural patterns, traditions, communities will be obliterated. In many places, if not all places, the present farm population will be replaced by people not now engaged in agriculture, for the inefficient land corporations will have great need of imported cheap labor. They will have to reduce the populations in their wheat, corn, cotton, livestock, and fruit factories – their vast soil-mining territories. Any rural homesteads remaining on soil acquired by them will have to be removed. Gigantic, collectivized mass shelters will have to be provided for the men and women and children who will come to the company camps. These laborers may be left to camp on the roadsides as we have witnessed in California and Missouri. Homesteads for these people will be unthinkable. They entire corporation process will make it clear that in its philosophy the giant factory farm is more important than the farmer who it reduces to the status of the proletarian hired man. Tenancy does much harm to our rural population; but it remains for the land corporation to destroy the farm homes, reduce the farm families to serfs, and erase forever all the economic, social, and spiritual values in our traditionally free and independent, brave and democratic American rural life. This last octopus of Wall Street will drive the remaining families from the land and crush the enterprises upon which they have spent the best years of their life – the personally owned and controlled productive enterprises on which democracy is built. Senator Arthur Capper gives a correct report on corporation farming and its destructive implications when he says:

Corporation farming is bad public policy. It is dangerous… Every farmer and every business man in rural America and every worker in the big industrial centers should oppose it. I feel that we are justified by the facts as known and the possibilities of the future as indicated by those facts, in using every proper means to nip this corporate farming development before it gets firmly established.9

In the areas where farm corporations have picked up the title deeds to their 20,000- and 30,000-acre tracts, the experience of the man, the farm home, the farm family, the school, the church, the community has been a sad one. In these areas social and spiritual leaders have learned what to expect under a system of factory farming. These leaders know that their social, moral, and spiritual institutions are given but a small chance to establish themselves and can never hope to become vital factors in these rootless communities of landless people who are allowed to become even more transient than the harvest in their efforts to find work in the specialized farm factories.

Mark A. Dawber gives us a sound warning when he writes:

The maintenance of the family the year-round is not the overhead of farming. It is the overhead of civilization. Replace individual farmers with floating hands employed for a few months in the year and you might just as well nail shut the doors of the churches and the institutions of learning. Individual farmers, not floating farm hands, rear children and give opportunities for scholastic education.10

A picture of what he calls “floating farm hands” is graphically give us in these verses. It will not readily be forgotten.

themovers


Print pagePDF pageEmail page

One Comment add one

  1. Shirley Kidwell says:

    Mike,
    The menace of corporation (aka Big Ag) has progressed a lot further than you seem to think.
    The legal games being used by these giant factory farm corporations are very sophisticated and manipulative. The use of legal constructs such as shell companies with no assets holding permits, CAFOs being put on small tracts of land with no ownership or lease of land to apply the manure, the use of easement contracts to control the sites, and the transfer of that manure to landowners under “easement contracts” have become the new ways to avoid corporate liability for damages and to remove themselves from regulations and lawsuits.
    Take a long, hard look at the new regulations on CAFOs in Missouri that remove regulation of manure under state only no-discharge permits, the structures of those applying for permitting under these new regulations.
    See facebook.com/friendsofresponsibleagriculture for the battle going on there.

Leave a Reply