<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Action Alert: Comment on the Packers and Stockyards Act Proposed Rule	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DONNA WARNER		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-12005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DONNA WARNER]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-12005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Offutt:

I am a Concerned Citizen.

[Customize your comment with your story: If you are a producer, what is the name and location of your farm? What do you grow? How long have you been in operation? Why is fair competition important to you? If you are not a farmer, why is a fair and competitive agriculture market important to you?]

The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:

A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.
Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.
The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.
Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.
A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.
I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.

America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better.
FOR TO LONG THE FARMERS AND SMALL RANCHERS ARE BEING ATTACKED! I AM SORRY TO SAY THAT ONLY THE BIG RANCHERS WHO ARE IN LEAGUE WITH THE BLM TAKES OVER LANDS THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO BE HELD FOR WILD HORSES ARE KILLING THEM! THIS A CRIME AND BLM SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN NOW! IT&#039;S ONLY ALLEGIANCE IS TO THE RICH AND POWERFUL! OUR GOVERNMENT IS MORE FOR-PROFIT THAN FOR OUR ECO-SYSTEM OR FOR WHAT THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WANT! STOP THE LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY AND THE CORPORATIONS WHO WANT CONTROL OVER THE MEAT AND POULTRY INDUSTRY! GIVE THE RIGHTS BACK TO THE PEOPLE!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Offutt:</p>
<p>I am a Concerned Citizen.</p>
<p>[Customize your comment with your story: If you are a producer, what is the name and location of your farm? What do you grow? How long have you been in operation? Why is fair competition important to you? If you are not a farmer, why is a fair and competitive agriculture market important to you?]</p>
<p>The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:</p>
<p>A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.<br />
Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.<br />
The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.<br />
Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.<br />
A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.<br />
I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.</p>
<p>America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better.<br />
FOR TO LONG THE FARMERS AND SMALL RANCHERS ARE BEING ATTACKED! I AM SORRY TO SAY THAT ONLY THE BIG RANCHERS WHO ARE IN LEAGUE WITH THE BLM TAKES OVER LANDS THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO BE HELD FOR WILD HORSES ARE KILLING THEM! THIS A CRIME AND BLM SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN NOW! IT&#8217;S ONLY ALLEGIANCE IS TO THE RICH AND POWERFUL! OUR GOVERNMENT IS MORE FOR-PROFIT THAN FOR OUR ECO-SYSTEM OR FOR WHAT THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WANT! STOP THE LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY AND THE CORPORATIONS WHO WANT CONTROL OVER THE MEAT AND POULTRY INDUSTRY! GIVE THE RIGHTS BACK TO THE PEOPLE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OCM Staff		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-12000</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OCM Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-12000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, thank you so much for your comments! Please be sure to post your comments on the Federal Register website: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/13/2020-00152/undue-and-unreasonable-preferences-and-advantages-under-the-packers-and-stockyards-act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone, thank you so much for your comments! Please be sure to post your comments on the Federal Register website: <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/13/2020-00152/undue-and-unreasonable-preferences-and-advantages-under-the-packers-and-stockyards-act" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/13/2020-00152/undue-and-unreasonable-preferences-and-advantages-under-the-packers-and-stockyards-act</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emily Garcia		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-11999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Garcia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-11999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Offutt:

I am a Concerned Citizen.

[Customize your comment with your story: If you are a producer, what is the name and location of your farm? What do you grow? How long have you been in operation? Why is fair competition important to you? If you are not a farmer, why is a fair and competitive agriculture market important to you?]

The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:

A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.
Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.
The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.
Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.
A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.
I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.

America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better.

Thank You

Emily Garcia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Offutt:</p>
<p>I am a Concerned Citizen.</p>
<p>[Customize your comment with your story: If you are a producer, what is the name and location of your farm? What do you grow? How long have you been in operation? Why is fair competition important to you? If you are not a farmer, why is a fair and competitive agriculture market important to you?]</p>
<p>The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:</p>
<p>A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.<br />
Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.<br />
The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.<br />
Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.<br />
A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.<br />
I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.</p>
<p>America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better.</p>
<p>Thank You</p>
<p>Emily Garcia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blaine Charles Kemna		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-11998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaine Charles Kemna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-11998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr. Mr. Offutt;
I am a MO beef farmer.
I have watched numerous cattle farmers go out of business because of the unfair regulations that favor corporate farmers.  This needs to change.  We as independent producers have numerous regulations imposed upon us that make it virtually impossible the operate at a profitable level.  The same regulations should be imposed on corporate farms that we are forced to live under..  The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act does not go far enough to protect farmers.
&quot;A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.
Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.
The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.
Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.
A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.&quot;  
The above quote came from a lady name Joy in the above quote.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Mr. Offutt;<br />
I am a MO beef farmer.<br />
I have watched numerous cattle farmers go out of business because of the unfair regulations that favor corporate farmers.  This needs to change.  We as independent producers have numerous regulations imposed upon us that make it virtually impossible the operate at a profitable level.  The same regulations should be imposed on corporate farms that we are forced to live under..  The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act does not go far enough to protect farmers.<br />
&#8220;A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.<br />
Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.<br />
The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.<br />
Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.<br />
A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.&#8221;<br />
The above quote came from a lady name Joy in the above quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: peternote		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-11997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peternote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-11997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Offutt:

I am a consumer who is closely connected to the local farming industry.

I see the government culling competition and awarding everything to giant farming/animal husbandry.  This leads to lower quality produce, fleeing consumers for corporate profits, a screwing of the local farmer (i.e. &quot;small businesses&quot; that politicians love to support in word only).  and an extremely vulnerable food supply.

The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:

    A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.
    Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.
    The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.
    Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.
    A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.

I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.

America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better. 

Sincerely,

Peter Burke]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Offutt:</p>
<p>I am a consumer who is closely connected to the local farming industry.</p>
<p>I see the government culling competition and awarding everything to giant farming/animal husbandry.  This leads to lower quality produce, fleeing consumers for corporate profits, a screwing of the local farmer (i.e. &#8220;small businesses&#8221; that politicians love to support in word only).  and an extremely vulnerable food supply.</p>
<p>The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:</p>
<p>    A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.<br />
    Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.<br />
    The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.<br />
    Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.<br />
    A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.</p>
<p>I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.</p>
<p>America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better. </p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Peter Burke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michelle Canning		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-11996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle Canning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-11996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please end the monopoly that the Packers have created which takes most of the profit away from beef producers.  We producers need a level playing field

Also we need to end imports of beef from outside the US!

Michelle Canning
Long Ridge Farm
Shelbyville,  KY]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please end the monopoly that the Packers have created which takes most of the profit away from beef producers.  We producers need a level playing field</p>
<p>Also we need to end imports of beef from outside the US!</p>
<p>Michelle Canning<br />
Long Ridge Farm<br />
Shelbyville,  KY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carolyn M. Johnson :-)		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-11995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carolyn M. Johnson :-)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-11995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am a Wyoming rancher who is still living 40 miles from the nearest town and grocery store in God&#039;s country where my grandfather homesteaded in 1908.  As long as I can recall, my parents talked about how important the enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act is to keep our markets competitive and healthy.   The new changes must include STRICT and ENFORCEABLE safeguards against collusion and price fixing, with CLARITY OF LANGUAGE for all involved, making offenses indefensible.

As livestock producers, we need Country of Origin Labeling on our happy, healthy, home-raised, superior-quality beef.   We are 76 and 80 years of age, have no hired assistance, and are proud of our product, the best in the world; our government (YOU) needs to be upholding us, not allowing the watering down of distinctions and letting inferior products dilute our markets.   We do not want or need financial help; we just need a fair playing field and competitive open markets.

We deserve your support and expect decisive clear decisions and improvements in the proposed changes.

Thank you for your serious consideration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Wyoming rancher who is still living 40 miles from the nearest town and grocery store in God&#8217;s country where my grandfather homesteaded in 1908.  As long as I can recall, my parents talked about how important the enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act is to keep our markets competitive and healthy.   The new changes must include STRICT and ENFORCEABLE safeguards against collusion and price fixing, with CLARITY OF LANGUAGE for all involved, making offenses indefensible.</p>
<p>As livestock producers, we need Country of Origin Labeling on our happy, healthy, home-raised, superior-quality beef.   We are 76 and 80 years of age, have no hired assistance, and are proud of our product, the best in the world; our government (YOU) needs to be upholding us, not allowing the watering down of distinctions and letting inferior products dilute our markets.   We do not want or need financial help; we just need a fair playing field and competitive open markets.</p>
<p>We deserve your support and expect decisive clear decisions and improvements in the proposed changes.</p>
<p>Thank you for your serious consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joy		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/action-alert-comment-on-the-packers-and-stockyards-act-proposed-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-11994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://competitivemarkets.com/?p=5277#comment-11994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Offutt:

I am a concerned citizen who has  friends who farm.

I have long watched small farmers go out of business because of regulations that favor corporate farmers.  This should not be! As someone who cares strongly about what goes into my body, and as someone who raised livestock herself for many years (horses, goats), I am concerned with humane conditions. 

The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:

    A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.
    Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.
    The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.
    Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.
    A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.

I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.

America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Offutt:</p>
<p>I am a concerned citizen who has  friends who farm.</p>
<p>I have long watched small farmers go out of business because of regulations that favor corporate farmers.  This should not be! As someone who cares strongly about what goes into my body, and as someone who raised livestock herself for many years (horses, goats), I am concerned with humane conditions. </p>
<p>The proposed changes to the Packers and Stockyards Act must include stronger protections for farmers.  Farmers need the following:</p>
<p>    A strong statement on competitive harm that removes unreasonable burdens of proof from farmers.<br />
    Protection to file complaints and identify wrongdoing without the threat of retaliation.<br />
    The right to form and join farmer associations without suffering retaliation.<br />
    Fair payment that is not the result of price fixing or collusion but rather based on clear, transparent, predictable standards.<br />
    A detailed, specific rule outlining undue preference that covers all forms of livestock, is suitable for the future of the industry, is enforceable, and has real consequences for companies that commit offenses.</p>
<p>I also strongly urge you to strike the criteria that will permit abusive and exploitative practices that are “customary” in this industry. Just because a practice is customary in an industry does not mean it is acceptable.</p>
<p>America’s farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and consumers deserve better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
