<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Evaluating My Beef Checkoff Return on Investment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 13:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Evaluating My Beef Checkoff Return on Investment, by Vaughn Meyer &#8211; News.MikeCallicrate.com &#124; A NoBull News Service		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11923</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evaluating My Beef Checkoff Return on Investment, by Vaughn Meyer &#8211; News.MikeCallicrate.com &#124; A NoBull News Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=3293#comment-11923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Evaluating My Beef Checkoff Return on Investment [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Evaluating My Beef Checkoff Return on Investment [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ME White		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11622</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ME White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=3293#comment-11622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11126&quot;&gt;Mike Callicrate&lt;/a&gt;.

Colorado Cattlemen&#039;s Association USED TO BE run by ranchers.  Look up all their board and bosses--FEEDERS!!!  They have no idea how to raise a calf!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11126">Mike Callicrate</a>.</p>
<p>Colorado Cattlemen&#8217;s Association USED TO BE run by ranchers.  Look up all their board and bosses&#8211;FEEDERS!!!  They have no idea how to raise a calf!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 10 reasons to vote &#8220;No&#8221; on the Oklahoma beef checkoff increase &#8211; Organization for Competitive Markets		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 reasons to vote &#8220;No&#8221; on the Oklahoma beef checkoff increase &#8211; Organization for Competitive Markets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=3293#comment-11495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The checkoff program doesn&#8217;t benefit those who pay the tax. Oklahoma Cattlemen&#8217;s Association and the other proponents of the checkoff increase highlight that the existing checkoff funds result in a $11.20 return on investment to the industry, but since 2014 cattle producers have seen a 43% drop in cattle prices and a 22% drop in the farm share of the retail beef dollar. The “industry” may be making money off the checkoff, but Oklahoma cattle producers are getting less today. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The checkoff program doesn&#8217;t benefit those who pay the tax. Oklahoma Cattlemen&#8217;s Association and the other proponents of the checkoff increase highlight that the existing checkoff funds result in a $11.20 return on investment to the industry, but since 2014 cattle producers have seen a 43% drop in cattle prices and a 22% drop in the farm share of the retail beef dollar. The “industry” may be making money off the checkoff, but Oklahoma cattle producers are getting less today. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Jeppesen		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11490</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Jeppesen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=3293#comment-11490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Follow the money....  straight to corruption.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money&#8230;.  straight to corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dennis Drayton		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis Drayton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=3293#comment-11171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its sure great after all this time that Sen. Mike Lee&#039;s S.3200 will do away with all the arguments about what to do with check-off monies and the need to read any more of Vaughn Meyers long- winded exposes&#039;!! Just rread the language in Sen. Lee&#039;s introduction to S.3200. That says it all! Dennis Drayton, Lemmon SD]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its sure great after all this time that Sen. Mike Lee&#8217;s S.3200 will do away with all the arguments about what to do with check-off monies and the need to read any more of Vaughn Meyers long- winded exposes&#8217;!! Just rread the language in Sen. Lee&#8217;s introduction to S.3200. That says it all! Dennis Drayton, Lemmon SD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Callicrate		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/evaluating-my-beef-checkoff-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-11126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Callicrate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=3293#comment-11126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vaughn,

The Kaiser study is highly deceptive. Kaiser never evaluated returns to cattlemen. He evaluated returns to the “industry,” which included packer profits; he did not separate the benefits (costs?) to cow/calf operators and to feeders from packer profits.

Kaiser and the CBB have refused to publicly disclose the data used for the study. Heck, there is so much CON in eCONometrics that reputable academic journals now require disclosure of data. With good reason.

CBB, show us your expenditure data and anything else you provided to Kaiser.

C. Robert Taylor
Professor Emeritus of Agricultural Economics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaughn,</p>
<p>The Kaiser study is highly deceptive. Kaiser never evaluated returns to cattlemen. He evaluated returns to the “industry,” which included packer profits; he did not separate the benefits (costs?) to cow/calf operators and to feeders from packer profits.</p>
<p>Kaiser and the CBB have refused to publicly disclose the data used for the study. Heck, there is so much CON in eCONometrics that reputable academic journals now require disclosure of data. With good reason.</p>
<p>CBB, show us your expenditure data and anything else you provided to Kaiser.</p>
<p>C. Robert Taylor<br />
Professor Emeritus of Agricultural Economics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
