<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ruling Upholding Meat Labeling Rule Vacated to Consider First Amendment Issue	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:13:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NOBULL: Ruling Upholding COOL Vacated to Consider First Amendment Issue &#8211; News.MikeCallicrate.com &#124; A NoBull News Service		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-11789</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NOBULL: Ruling Upholding COOL Vacated to Consider First Amendment Issue &#8211; News.MikeCallicrate.com &#124; A NoBull News Service]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competitivemarkets.com/?p=2397#comment-11789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Ruling Upholding Meat Labeling Rule Vacated to Consider First Amendment Issue [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ruling Upholding Meat Labeling Rule Vacated to Consider First Amendment Issue [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Lee		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 14:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competitivemarkets.com/?p=2397#comment-417</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-416&quot;&gt;Tom Terry&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the clear exp of the ruling, that legal jumbo is meant to be confusing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-416">Tom Terry</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the clear exp of the ruling, that legal jumbo is meant to be confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Terry		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Terry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 03:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competitivemarkets.com/?p=2397#comment-416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It means that the meat packers get another bite at the apple to overturn the new rules that make COOL work with WTO ruled :&quot;issues&quot;.

Judges have overstepped their bounds in bending over to meat packers in the past.  I see this as another move in that direction.

The case will be re heard and the ruling against meat packers will be reviewed as they have yet another bite at the legal apple to overturn the rules.

If these judges cave into this corporatism they should be taken off the bench.  They are the backstop for corporations who are the real ones running our country..

Stay tuned.  Meat packers have a lot of other tricks up their sleeves on this and many other issues.  Federal courts have been abusing their power to make room for these corporations to do whatever they want.  If it is illegal, just get these judges to re interpret the law so that it isn&#039;t illegal.  

This should have been laughed out of court and meat packers made to pay for it being a frivolous lawsuit.  It was not.  Our courts are just another layer of protection for the robber barons of the day.

Tom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means that the meat packers get another bite at the apple to overturn the new rules that make COOL work with WTO ruled :&#8221;issues&#8221;.</p>
<p>Judges have overstepped their bounds in bending over to meat packers in the past.  I see this as another move in that direction.</p>
<p>The case will be re heard and the ruling against meat packers will be reviewed as they have yet another bite at the legal apple to overturn the rules.</p>
<p>If these judges cave into this corporatism they should be taken off the bench.  They are the backstop for corporations who are the real ones running our country..</p>
<p>Stay tuned.  Meat packers have a lot of other tricks up their sleeves on this and many other issues.  Federal courts have been abusing their power to make room for these corporations to do whatever they want.  If it is illegal, just get these judges to re interpret the law so that it isn&#8217;t illegal.  </p>
<p>This should have been laughed out of court and meat packers made to pay for it being a frivolous lawsuit.  It was not.  Our courts are just another layer of protection for the robber barons of the day.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Callicrate		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Callicrate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competitivemarkets.com/?p=2397#comment-412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-411&quot;&gt;Bruce Lee&lt;/a&gt;.

We basically get to start over with the full panel of 11 judges deciding the case rather than the three judge panel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-411">Bruce Lee</a>.</p>
<p>We basically get to start over with the full panel of 11 judges deciding the case rather than the three judge panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Lee		</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/ruling-upholding-meat-labeling-rule-vacated-to-consider-first-amendment-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.competitivemarkets.com/?p=2397#comment-411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So what in latman&#039;s ( cowboys) terms does this mean? Did we win or not?
   Bruce Lee
  Choteau, Mt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what in latman&#8217;s ( cowboys) terms does this mean? Did we win or not?<br />
   Bruce Lee<br />
  Choteau, Mt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
