<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AMS Oversight of Commodity Research and Promotion Programs &#8211; Organization for Competitive Markets</title>
	<atom:link href="https://competitivemarkets.com/tag/ams-oversight-of-commodity-research-and-promotion-programs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://competitivemarkets.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41386461</site>	<item>
		<title>Guideline for AMS Oversight of Commodity Research and Promotion Programs</title>
		<link>https://competitivemarkets.com/guideline-for-ams-oversight-of-commodity-research-and-promotion-programs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkoff Program Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMS Oversight of Commodity Research and Promotion Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beef Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checkoff contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary Vilsack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitivemarkets.com/?p=2918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="295" height="180" src="https://competitivemarkets.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ams-finalcolor-12-22-300x210-295x180.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" /></p>Conflicts of Interest in Research and Promotion Programs As a general matter of policy, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) guidelines for oversight of all checkoff programs expressly require contracting procedures that “avoid any conflict of interest or a situation that could reasonably be perceived by a third party as a conflict of interest.”1 The Beef Order includes provisions that reflect these principles, as well. Before service on the board or as a Federation representative on the Beef Promotion <a href="https://competitivemarkets.com/guideline-for-ams-oversight-of-commodity-research-and-promotion-programs/" class="read-more">Read More ...</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2918</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
