USDA Stonewalling Cattlemen – OCM Files Complaint

Written on:November 12, 2014
 
Comments
Add One

OCM_LETTERHEAD
November 11, 2014

For Immediate Release

USDA Stonewalling Cattlemen – OCM Files Complaint

Today, the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) filed a complaint for injunctive relief, demanding the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Agriculture make a final determination and release all required records related to a 2013 FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request regarding Beef Checkoff audit reports.

The action filed today follows an 18-month struggle to obtain the truth about an OIG Beef Checkoff audit began in February 2011. The audit was presumably prompted by the disturbing findings of a Clifton Gunderson Accounting Firm performance review commissioned by the Cattlemen’s Beef Board. After examining the equivalent of a mere nine days of activity, irregularities were uncovered which resulted in the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) having to return more than $200,000. These numerous irregularities included improper payment for such things as spousal travel and private loans.

More than two years after beginning its investigation and after generating more than 3,000 pages of report drafts, OIG released a scant, seventeen-page report that appeared wholly irreconcilable with the Clifton Gunderson findings. Remarkably and to the contrary, it stated; “The Office of Inspector General (OIG) determined that the relationships between the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board (beef board) and other industry-related organizations … complied with legislation,”. This shocking statement was later removed from the report without explanation.

Unaddressed in the report was the glaring and fundamental conflict of interest created by NCBA having iron-fisted control of the Checkoff contract awarding process and using this control to consistently award more than 90% of the contracts to itself.

In an initial response to OCM’s FOIA request, OIG acknowledged it had located more than 10,000 pages of information. Yet, after 18 months and multiple demands, OCM has received less than 1,000 relatively innocuous, heavily redacted pages from OIG, and with no final determination in sight.

“OIG’s stonewalling on the release of the documents leads one to suspect an outright cover- up,” declared Fred Stokes, OCM board member. “I am personally convinced that the audit report is in stark variance with the facts found by the OIG investigators,” said Stokes.

OCM has been a leader in reforming the Beef Checkoff and restoring transparency and integrity to the program. Following the troubling findings of the Clifton Gunderson report, OCM brought together a number of cattle industry organizations and individuals to form, the Beef Checkoff Reform Taskforce. Representatives from this taskforce met with the OIG Beef Checkoff investigators in DC at the outset of the audit to share their concerns and pledge their support.

“There is no doubt that NCBA has been empowered by the some $50 million it has received annually for two decades now, and has used its resulting influence to promote the interests of global meat packers and big retailers against the interests of Checkoff-paying cattlemen. It’s now time to bring this regretful affair to light,” explained Stokes. “OCM is confident the records we have requested will clearly demonstrate that NCBA has played fast and loose with U.S. cattlemen’s money,” he said.

Attorneys for the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) filed the complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. HSUS attorneys are providing representation in furtherance of their work to reform the Beef Checkoff on behalf of organizations like OCM and to prevent misuses of the program for activities detrimental to animal welfare.

For a copy of the official complaint and or media inquiries, contact:

Fred Stokes
601-527-2459
fredstokes@wildblue.net

OIG FILING – CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1902


Courage For the World Teaches Food Sustainability

Written on:October 16, 2014
 
THUMBNAIL_IMAGE

Eating healthy foods from growers and ranchers using sustainable practices may seem like a daunting task but an organization called “Courage for the World” is making it easier. Using established networks, they are teaching people about food sources, the economic advantages to shoppers for buying locally even though it may cost slightly more, and the severe economic and environmental damage caused by multi-national corporate food factories and laboratories. Their message…

Read more...

A Big Controversy is Brewing

Written on:October 8, 2014
 
A Big Controversy is Brewing

October 8, 2014 For Immediate Release A Big Controversy is Brewing Secretary Vilsack has announced that he will take summary action to reform the Beef Checkoff. NCBA has dubbed the initiative “train wrecking the Checkoff”. Not surprising since the change may threaten their gravy train. The Checkoff represents more than 80% of their total revenue. The Checkoff program is a dismal failure which has been made into an NCBA slush…

Read more...

36 Groups Urge Ag Secretary to Enforce Beef Checkoff Program’s Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest; Urge Other Reforms

Written on:September 11, 2014
 
36 Groups Urge Ag Secretary to Enforce Beef Checkoff Program’s Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest; Urge Other Reforms

Joint News Release For Immediate Release: Contact: Bill Bullard: (406-670-8157) Fred Stokes (601-527-2459) September 11, 2014 36 Groups Urge Ag Secretary to Enforce Beef Checkoff Program’s Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest; Urge Other Reforms Washington, DC – In the wake of this weekend’s announcement by the National Farmers Union (NFU) that it was withdrawing from the Beef Checkoff Enhancement Working Group (working group), 36 organizations sent a joint letter today…

Read more...

Like GM, Food Companies Place Profits Over Safety and Security

Written on:September 2, 2014
 
Like GM, Food Companies Place Profits Over Safety and Security

Our nation’s food system is at risk! By Mike Callicrate Putting people at risk to save a buck isn’t isolated to the automotive industry. In today’s global economy, where the biggest cheater wins, foreign imports of beef and the recent return of Pink Slime add insult to injury for the few remaining independent producers and meat processors struggling to survive. Food companies from Walmart to Chipotle to the mom and…

Read more...

Guideline for AMS Oversight of Commodity Research and Promotion Programs

Written on:September 2, 2014
 
ams-finalcolor-12-22-300x210

Conflicts of Interest in Research and Promotion Programs As a general matter of policy, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) guidelines for oversight of all checkoff programs expressly require contracting procedures that “avoid any conflict of interest or a situation that could reasonably be perceived by a third party as a conflict of interest.”1 The Beef Order includes provisions that reflect these principles, as well. Before service on the board or…

Read more...

Center of the Road

Written on:September 2, 2014
 
RichardOswald

Driving down the middle of the road is a common practice in rural areas where back roads are marked mostly by two bare tracks. Meeting requires that passing cars yield by splitting the track. I remember once a long time ago when passing neighbors crunched bumpers on a gravel road. The law was called to establish liability for the crash. When a deputy arrived, he surveyed the scene. He determined…

Read more...

Briefing for USDA AMS Administrator Anne Alonzo

Written on:September 2, 2014
 
checkoffconflict

Ms. Alonzo, I am Fred Stokes representing The Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM), a sixteen year old non-profit advocate for a fair marketplace for what farmers and ranchers buy and what they sell.In other words, we want the game to be straight. I thank you for giving us this opportunity to express our concerns regarding the Beef Promotion and Research Program, commonly known as the Beef Checkoff. OCM has associated…

Read more...