Sen. Dierks says “NO” to destroying Nebraska livestock markets. Vote “NO” on LB176.

Written on:February 2, 2016
Add One

dierksAttached is the letter Sen. Dierks (retired) has asked me to circulate to you on LB176. It is useful to understand that scope and size the price “meltdown” in the hog sector. From 1997 to 2000, 2,500 hog producers were forced out of business. It was a time of deeply and widely felt financial and emotional crisis in our state. Out of the expectation that “somebody ought to do something”, the Legislature responded with the Competitive Livestock Markets Act. Sen. Dierks was the Chair of the Agriculture Committee during that period of time. LB835, the Competitive Livestock Markets Act was his Priority Bill. It enjoyed overwhelming support before it was signed by Governor Johanns. It has served our state well. In my book, it was our Legislature responding to a crisis in a measured, timely, and appropriate way. I was proud of our state.

Cap Dierks’s letter also reminds us there is a price problem in the beef sector today causing a massive loss of equity in both the finished beef sector as well as for cow calf producers. As you can tell when you read Cap’s letter, he still remembers, and he still cares.

Thank you for your consideration,

John K. Hansen, President
Nebraska Farmers Union
1305 Plum Street, Lincoln, NE 68502
402-476-8815 Office 402-476-8859 Fax
402-476-8608 Home 402-580-8815 Cell

P.O. Box 206
Ewing, NE 68735

February 1, 2016

Dear Senator,

I served as the Chair of the Nebraska Legislature’s Agriculture Committee during the economic crisis of 1998 and 1999 caused by depressed hog prices that put thousands of hog producers out of business. It is important to remember that the crisis was caused by the pork processors who drove the market down to 7 cents per pound.

When I say crisis, it was not just hog producers who were being squeezed out of business. The whole rural community was hurting. Our agricultural lenders were in trouble, feed suppliers, and everyone that provided services to hog producers, including veterinarians were getting squeezed.

The phone calls were many, heartfelt, desperate, and painful. Many millions of dollars of equity were lost within a very short period of time. People wanted and needed help. Everyone was wondering what we could do to help the people who were being squeezed out.

The Legislature’s Agriculture Committee introduced four bills. LB832, LB833, LB8345, and LB835. Three of these four bills were combined and became the Competitive Livestock Markets Act. It was obvious that the Packers and Stockyards division of USDA were not doing their job to oversee and police agricultural markets to keep them competitive.

The Legislature did the right thing. Governor Johanns signed the bill. When the pork packers saw what happened and that Congress was getting pressure to also act, the cash price of hogs jumped up over night. While it took some of the financial pressure off, it also proved they were manipulating the price.

There is a meat packer caused crisis in the country today. Our feedlots are losing $300 to $600 per head on their cattle, the price of calves continues to sink, and the price of beef in the store has hardly moved. LB176 will weaken the legal leg that the remaining beef ban stands on. LB176 turns the pork processors loose so they can get more captive supply to further depress and control pork prices, both cash and pork. That will not help pork producers in the long run, and it will also set the stage for the destruction of the beef industry that my family depend on for our livelihood.

It looks like to me that instead of weakening the Competitive Livestock Markets Act with the passage of LB176, the Legislature ought to be looking for ways to put more competition into our livestock markets. It is never a good idea to get rid of competition, which is just what LB176 does. I respectfully ask you to vote against LB176. This bill solves no problems, but it will make the market problems we already have worse.


Screen shot 2016-02-02 at 3.18.40 PM

M.L. Dierks, Legislative District 40, Retired

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Corporate Farming Bill Threatens Nebraska’s Family Farms

Written on:February 1, 2016
If pigs could vote, they would say NO to LB176

NEWS RELEASE February 1, 2016 Corporate Farming Bill Threatens Nebraska’s Family Farms The Organization for Competitive Markets is calling on farmers, ranchers and consumers across Nebraska to strongly oppose a bill in the state legislature that would reduce competition in the marketplace by allowing packer ownership of hogs. Nebraska is the only state that still prohibits packers from owning hogs more than five days prior to slaughter. “We can’t let…


LB176 Letter to Senators – February 1, 2016

Written on:February 1, 2016
LB176 Letter to Senators – February 1, 2016

February 1, 2016 Dear Senator: As president of the Organization for Competitive Markets, I sent the Agriculture Committee a strong letter of opposition to LB176 last year. On February 2, 1999, I testified before the Legislature’s Agriculture Committee in favor of LB832, LB833, LB834, and LB835 which were later merged into the Competitive Livestock Markets Act. I testified as the owner and manager of a large beef feedlot in Kansas,…


OCM Membership Letter 2016

Written on:January 26, 2016

January 25, 2016 It can be said by those in the livestock industry that these are the worst of times. Whether you are an American cattleman, hog producer or poultry grower, you have felt the continued squeeze on your bottom line. It is beyond anything you have had to endure in the past. It is clear the big packers, through their industrial factory farming practices, have tightened their stranglehold on…


Important Sign-On Letter for LA School District Chicken Procurement

Written on:January 25, 2016

OCM National Collaboration Members, On behalf of the Organization for Competitive Markets poultry committee led by Mike Weaver, I am reaching out to seek your organization’s support of an effort to ensure more locally-sourced, fair, humane, environmentally sustainable, and nutritious chicken is served in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) cafeterias. The LAUSD is the largest public school system in the state of California, and the second largest in…


America Returns to the Jungle

Written on:December 12, 2015

A safe and secure food supply is essential to a free society The United States was always able to feed itself. Except for a few non-essentials like coffee, tea and bananas, we were self-sufficient. The British government, along with their corporate partner, the East India Company, saw unlimited potential to extract wealth through the American colonies. Our Founding Fathers, willing to fight for our freedom and sovereignty, risked their lives…


The Beef Checkoff: A Broken and Failed Program

Written on:December 11, 2015
Screen Shot 2014-12-22 at 8.45.42 AM

Organization for Competitive Markets In the early 80’s, after several years of losing market share to other meats, especially chicken,U.S. beef cattle producers initiated a Beef Checkoff Program (Checkoff Program) to promote beef. The program came into being on the third referendum and was included in the Farm Bill in 1985 as the Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985. In 1996, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) became the…


Meat of the Matter: Bigger is not better

Written on:December 10, 2015

Article By Dan Murphy November 17, 2015 Here’s a trend producers know all too well: Corporate consolidation goes forward in the name of “efficiency,” and the end result is bad news for everyone other than management and investors. Newsflash: The Kraft Heinz Co. just announced that the company is eliminating 2,600 jobs and closing seven processing plants. That’s on top of the previously announced elimination of 2,500 administrative jobs. According…