On Tuesday, NCBA’s attempt to delay and disrupt OCM’s search for the truth hit a snag when a federal court greatly limited its role in a lawsuit for beef checkoff records. A federal court allowed the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) a limited entry into a lawsuit brought by OCM to obtain audit records of the beef checkoff program. NCBA had been seeking full party status.
In part the court’s order stated,
“NCBA’s participation in this case is limited to reviewing documents and records for NCBA’s confidential and proprietary business information and objecting to the production of documents and records to OCM exclusively on the basis that those documents and records contain NCBA’s confidential and proprietary business information.”
“We are pleased that the judge stopped NCBA’s attempted overreach to keep the truth from the independent cattle producers who pay the mandated beef checkoff payments,” stated OCM board member Fred Stokes. “We are not seeking proprietary information, but we sure are demanding to see how our checkoff funds have been spent by NCBA, who we feel is responsible for hiding the truth from cattle producers. It’s our money; it’s our right to know.”
The order was issued in a lawsuit brought by OCM, demanding the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Department of Agriculture disclose its records relating to an audit of the federal beef checkoff.
OCM’s demand for the documents stems from the discrepancies between two audits. The first was a performance review conducted by Clifton Gunderson Accounting Firm (CG), commissioned by the Cattlemen’s Beef Board (CBB). The partial performance review uncovered irregularities in how NCBA was spending Beef Checkoff Program funds, resulting in NCBA having to return to the Cattlemen’s Beef Board (CBB) more than $200,000. These numerous irregularities included improper payment for such things as spousal travel and private loans.
The second audit was initiated by the USDA OIG. In 2011, following the CG performance review, OIG began their audit of USDA’s Agriculture Marketing Services (AMS), the agency whose responsibility is to oversee the checkoff programs. The investigation was completed in December of 2011, and 15 long months later a scant 17-page report was finally released (first “final” audit report).
This first “final” audit report concluded that NCBA had properly expended all Beef Checkoff Program funds and that the relationship between the CBB and the NCBA complied with U.S. law.
Because these OIG findings flew in the face of the CG 2010 performance review, OCM promptly filed their request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for an extensive list of records pertaining to the first “final” audit report. The OIG FOIA office initially responded by releasing 101 heavily redacted pages and denied release of the 3,120 pages of report drafts and 125 pages of related emails under a claim of exemption. Under this and other pressure, the first final audit report was withdrawn in July 2013.
Then on January 31, 2014, OIG issued a corrected final report, some 36 months after the initiation of the audit. This corrected final report withdrew OIG’s conclusions that the NCBA had properly expended all Beef Checkoff Program funds and that the relationship between the Beef Checkoff program’s Cattlemen’s Beef Board and the NCBA complied with U.S. law.
“We simply believe every cattle producer deserves to know the truth,” stated OCM President Mike Weaver. “We don’t think that it is too much to ask to know the truth on how our government mandated checkoff payments are being spent, especially when the primary contractor of the Beef Checkoff Program, the NCBA, claims membership of only 4% of cattle producers.”
Through the advancement of their anti-Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) efforts and other anti-independent family farm policies, OCM believes NCBA has contributed heavily in the destruction of our cattle markets. Calf prices are nearly half of what they were when COOL was in place. NCBA lobbied to abolish COOL on behalf of packers so that cheap imported South American beef could be secretly co-mingled with US beef.
“Enough is enough,” concluded Fred Stokes.
For a copy of the official record and/or media inquiries, contact:
President Mike Weaver
In recent press statements, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) has made false statements regarding the beef checkoff audits. Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) would like to set the record straight. In 2010, the Clifton Gunderson Accounting Firm performance review commissioned by the Cattlemen’s Beef Board, examined small number of expenditures and personnel time cards over a 29-month period ending in 2010. Irregularities were uncovered which resulted in the NCBA having…Read more...
On Friday, September 30, 2016, attorneys for the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) filed their response in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to the National Cattleman Beef Association’s (NCBA) late attempt to intervene in a case filed by OCM to obtain records from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) related to Beef Checkoff Program activities. In October of 2014, OCM filed the original complaint for injunctive…Read more...
On Tuesday, in a desperate move to conceal the truth about how cattlemen’s Beef Checkoff funds have been spent, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) filed a late claim to intervene in a case that has been ongoing for nearly two years and on an issue that the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) has been pursuing for over five years. In October of 2014, OCM filed the original complaint for…Read more...
Death of fair markets undermining food security US Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack missed the mark as chief of domestic agriculture on Thursday by defending the disastrous impacts of large-scale industrial agriculture, which pushes the true costs of cheap food production onto farmers, workers, and the environment (Politico Pro: “Vilsack Takes on Anti-Industrial Ag-ers”). The Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) is now declaring a state of emergency. “In an affront…Read more...
Dear Friends, Please find attached our new research related to egg prices and industrial agriculture as it relates to claims made in the robust debate surrounding State Question 777. As ever, our goal is discern fact from fiction in a nonpartisan manner. We believe the two attached sheets with infographics reveal a compelling (there’s that word!) snapshot of what’s really happening with regard to food prices. A hat tip to…Read more...
July 14, 2016 Dear Members of Congress: We, the undersigned organizations, businesses and individuals call on Congress to support Senators Booker’s and Lee’s S. 3201 and Senator Lee’s S. 3200. These bills address the demonstrated, egregious marketplace abuses committed by the commodity checkoff programs (“checkoff programs”). Checkoff programs were established to serve as mechanisms by which agricultural producers’ pool money for common promotional and research purposes. Fees are mandatory, from…Read more...
Joint News Release Contact: Bill Bullard (406-252-2516) Fred Stokes: (601-527-2459) July 14, 2016 Supporters Urge Congress to Take Action and Pass Meaningful Commodity Checkoff Program Reform Washington, DC – More than 140 organizations, ranchers, farmers and businesses applaud Senators Booker and Lee for filing legislation that, when passed, will stop commodity checkoff program abuses. Yesterday, the Senators filed the Commodity Checkoff Program Improvement Act (S. 3201), which would put an…Read more...