Farm and Food File for the week beginning Sunday, Aug. 26, 2012
by Alan Guebert
Somewhere along the line it became acceptable to bend and break the record of public figures and firms without any consequence whatsoever. Shortly thereafter distortion and deception replaced discussion and debate and yelling and lying replaced compromise and progress.
And that’s just in agriculture; in politics it’s even worse.
The latest farm and food fight centers on the legal battle that pits the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s management of the beef checkoff against long-time checkoff critic Mike Callicrate, a Kansas rancher who owns the Colorado-based Ranch Food Direct.
But it’s more than just the she-said, he-said checkoff standoff.
That unending fight would end if USDA simply conducted a multi-year audit of NCBA’s checkoff contracts. Past efforts to do just that, however, have been stiff-armed by NCBA’s powerful Capitol Hill allies who claim any audit of NCBA’s books is a waste of government time and money.
This political cover, well-irrigated by NCBA and its meatpacker members, allows the tiny cattle group (less than four percent of all U.S. cattle producers belong) outsized power as a political organization and as a checkoff contractor. That two-hatted trick also carries financial benefits for NCBA.
According to NCBA’s 2009 IRS Form 990 filings, the latest available, just $3.3 million of its $58.7 million in reported revenue came from membership dues. Most of the remainder came either directly or indirectly from the checkoff.
Threats to this rich river of revenue—and Callicrate’s federal lawsuit is an enormous threat—are met with cowboy hellfire and ranch brimstone.
In the past, NCBA has called on its in-the-pocket politicians and checkoff-benefiting media to sing its praises and deflect checkoff queries. This time, however, it was handed a loaded gun by two tough critics, Fred Stokes, outgoing president of the Organization for Competitive Markets, and Callicrate, OCM’s incoming president.
Stokes, a 77-year-old retired Army major, announced the federal lawsuit (that names Callicrate as its only plaintiff) Aug. 10 in a kick-off to OCM’s annual meeting.
In explaining the lawsuit, Stokes noted that OCM had asked attorneys at the Humane Society of the United States to examine rafts of checkoff material OCM had received from USDA through the Freedom of Information Act to assess the merits of any possible suit. HSUS attorneys did so for free.
After that revelation the sky fell on OCM, Stokes and Callicrate. Everyone with a wide-brimmed hat condemned the group and its leaders for taking any assistance from the Humane Society, a group mainline farm organizations reflexively loathe.
NCBA President J.D. Alexander fired first when, according to a NCBA press release later that day, he “expressed disgust… that (OCM) has formed a partnership with the (HSUS) to destroy more than 25 years of market development and consumer demand building by the Beef Checkoff Program.”
Alexander was wrong; OCM had not formed a “partnership” of any kind with HSUS. As Stokes explained, Humane Society attorneys, at OCM’s request, read checkoff documents to offer their unpaid judgment on whether a suit was advisable.
The checkoff lawsuit, in fact, was written and filed, pro bono, by Daniel Owen and G. Gabriel Zorogastua of Polsenelli Shughart PC, a Kansas City, MO law firm known for its antitrust expertise.
Worse, Alexander’s hyperbolic “destroy more than 25 years of market development and consumer demand building” is not just a personal opinion, it’s fact-defying baloney.
Since the 1987 start-up of the beef checkoff the number of U.S. beef operations has fallen from 1.01 million to 742,000, American retail sales of beef per capita have plummeted from 78.7 lbs. to 60.8 lbs., and the U.S. cattle herd has fallen from 102.1 million head to 90.8 million.
There are reasons for this dismal performance, but “market development,” “consumer demand,” and $1.5 billion of checkoff money would not be three of ‘em.
Additionally, as the American cattle sector continues a decades-long trend of losing an estimated 1,000 producers per month, the nation continues to outsource its beef. In the first six months of 2012, U.S. beef imports are up 21 percent and U.S. cattle imports are 22 percent over 2011.
And here’s another hard fact: HSUS, Callicrate and Stokes did nothing to bring about this atrocious record of checkoff failure.
So why is NCBA, a group that 94 percent of all cattlemen voluntarily choose not to join, making them the bogeyman for beef’s woe?
Because we sit silently as distortion and deception replace discussion and debate and yelling and lying replaces compromise and progress. Don’t worry; the lying and the yelling won’t kill democratic institutions.
The silence, however, might.
© 2012 ag comm
The Farm and Food File is published weekly in more than 70 newspapers in North America. Contact Alan Guebert at http://www.farmandfoodfile.com.
One thought on “Lies, distortions and lawsuits”
Comments are closed.